*Names in bold indicate Presenter
The shift toward means-testing, raises the price of Medicare relative to private health insurance, particularly employer-based insurance, and this relative price change could influence labor force participation decisions of Medicare age-eligible persons. Higher Medicare premiums may affect the decision to work and, conditional on working, the number of hours that an individual chooses to work. An increase in premiums decreases future disposable income and thereby creates an incentive for some individuals to postpone retirement so that they may accumulate enough wealth to live comfortably after retiring. Moreover, by reducing the price of ESHI relative to Medicare, means-tested premiums might induce some individuals to continue working in order to keep access to ESHI.
In this study, we use data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to examine the impact of means tested Part B premiums on the labor force participation decisions of the older adults. Since Medicare premiums are set by statute, they are assumed to be exogenous to individual labor supply decisions. We use linear probability models (LPM) to estimate the impact of Medicare premiums on the probability of being fully retired and on the decision to delay retirement beyond the full retirement age. The full retirement age is the age at which an individual is eligible for full Social Security benefits. In order to assess the robustness of our results, we estimate several specifications that control for an extensive set of variables, including measures of health, wealth and other sources of health insurance. We find that higher premiums have a small but statistically significant, negative effect on the probability of retiring. Higher premiums induce older adults to delay retirement beyond their full retirement age. We discuss the implications of our findings to Medicare revenues and the labor market implications of lower retirement rates.