Panel Paper: The Effect of Medicaid Payment Reform on Early Elective Deliveries

Friday, November 4, 2016 : 9:30 AM
Columbia 10 (Washington Hilton)

*Names in bold indicate Presenter

Heather M. Dahlen, Medica Research Institute


The U.S. ranks 17th in the world in perinatal mortality rate and 29th worldwide in infant mortality, near the bottom of industrialized nations. The practice of elective induction and delivery prior to 39 weeks is associated with substantial perinatal harm. Yet, almost one-fourth of deliveries undergo induction and the rate has more than doubled in the United States over the past decade (from 10% to 22.5%). Starting on October 1, 2011, Texas modified its Medicaid benefit criteria for obstetric deliveries to deny claims for any induced (or cesarean) delivery before 39 weeks if not medically necessary. In this study, we assess the impact of Texas’s Medicaid payment reform for early elective delivery, or hard-stop, on clinical care practices and perinatal outcomes, using states that did not pass hard-stop legislation over the time period for comparison.

We use National Vital Statistics System data, including the restricted geographic file, for the years 2009-2013. These data contain birth certificate records from all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. Data were merged to the 2014-2015 Area Health Resource File, which provided information on county-level economic and primary care provider characteristics for the five years in our study. Our key outcomes include early elective deliveries (induced and cesarean sections combined as well as cesarean section only), gestational age in weeks, birth weight (total, low birth weight, very low birth weight, and large for gestational age), and early non-elective deliveries. We employed a difference-in-difference strategy to isolate the effect of the hard-stop policy in Texas from unrelated underlying trends present in the control states. Models adjusted for characteristics of the delivery and mother, if a father was not present on the birth certificate, county-level economic and provider trends, state-specific time trends, and seasonality of birth.

There were significant reductions in early elective deliveries among Medicaid births in Texas, including reduced rates of cesarean section births, relative to the control states. Prior to hard-stop legislation, 11.2% of births paid by Medicaid in Texas were the result of early elective deliveries; after adjusting for changes in early elective deliveries in comparison states, this share dropped by 0.9 percentage points (p< .001). Birth outcomes also improved for babies covered by Medicaid in Texas, with relative increases in average gestational age and average birth weight.

Findings from this study suggest that the Medicaid hard-stop policy in Texas was effective in reducing the rate of medically unnecessary early elective deliveries among the Medicaid population. As a result, babies covered by this policy reached an older gestational age and greater gestational weight. Since Texas had one of the highest rates of early elective deliveries prior to enacting hard-stop, we would expect that states with similar baseline rates (Kentucky, Louisiana, Florida, Texas, and Mississippi) would also have relatively large reductions in early elective induction  rates should they pass  hard-stop legislation.