Panel Paper:
Does Salient Financial Information Affect Academic Performance and Borrowing Behavior Among College Students?
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
We rely on a unique administrative dataset containing detailed information on students' academic backgrounds, financial aid, and academic outcomes to analyze the effect of this intervention. We utilize a difference-in-difference-in-differences strategy to exploit three comparisons. First, we compare students who received the letters at Montana State University to those that also had loans but were below the cutoff for receiving a letter. Second, we compare students who received the letters at Montana State University to those that would have received the letters at the University of Montana had the same policy been in place on that campus. Third, we compare students who received the letters to those who would have received them in the years before the policy was implemented.
We find that students who receive the targeted letters reduce borrowing in the subsequent semester by $1,360, or about a third. For freshmen, the intervention increases retention rates for the subsequent semester and year. In addition, receiving a warning letter increases credits attained that semester, suggesting that students complete courses from which they may have otherwise withdrawn. These results suggest that early interventions that draw borrowers' attention to their relatively high student loan debt balances and that offer information and financial counseling on managing their debt, can change financial decisions and improve academic outcomes.