Panel Paper:
Weighting Methods for Unpacking Between-Site Heterogeneity in Causal Mechanisms
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
(1) Individual participation in education and training consistently mediated the program impact on earnings across all the experimental sites. In other words, the program impacts mediated by education and training (i.e., the indirect effect) did not show substantial variation across the sites, suggesting that the quality of education and training was nearly uniform across the Job Corps centers.
(2) Job Corps programs generated impacts on earnings through pathways other than education and training (i.e., the direct effect). Such impacts may be attributed to a comprehensive set of other services offered by Job Corps centers that were typically unavailable under the control condition. Interestingly, the direct effect varied by a great amount from site to site, explaining the between-site variation of the ITT effect. This result highlights the crucial role of supplementary services focusing on risk reduction for disadvantaged youth in addition to providing education and training.
(3) Individual participation in Job Corps education and training generated more benefits than education and training under the control condition. This evidence suggests that Job Corps programs produced a greater return to education and training than the alternative programs utilized by those in the control group.
(4) Job Corps programs that successfully increased employment and earnings through education and training did not necessarily display success in doing so through other service provision.
We have developed a ratio-of-mediator-probability weighting (RMPW) method that identifies the causal parameters when the treatment assignment and the mediator value assignment under each treatment are strongly ignorable within each site given the observed pretreatment covariates. A method-of-moments procedure incorporating RMPW consistently estimates all these causal parameters. Unlike maximum likelihood based multilevel path analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM), our strategy conveniently relaxes the assumption of no treatment-by-mediator interaction while greatly simplifying the outcome model specification without invoking strong distributional assumptions. In addition, we derive asymptotic standard error estimators that reflect the sampling variability of the estimated weights. Simulation studies have shown satisfactory performance of these estimation procedures.