Panel Paper:
The National Study of Learning, Voting, and Engagement: A New Dataset for Measuring College Student Political Learning and Participation
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
This paper introduces and demonstrates the value of the National Study of Learning, Voting, and Engagement (NSLVE), a partial but critical data source to fill research gaps not only about college student voting, but college student political learning and engagement more broadly. Other than NSLVE, colleges and universities have no objective measure of college student political participation. NSLVE provides an opportunity to re-examine the traditionally explored demographic factors (e.g., age, gender) viewed as relevant to student voting. More importantly, because data are collected and maintained at the institutional level, NSLVE provides the first opportunity to examine the institutional-level characteristics of colleges and universities with student voting rates (e.g., percent of Pell grant recipients, Carnegie classification).
This paper first describes the reliable and confidential process we developed for merging student-level enrollment data and publicly available voting records to generate a database of nearly 8 million student records at over 800 participating colleges and universities. The process included (1) recruiting college and university campuses to obtain permission to use student data, (2) partnering with the National Student Clearinghouse (“the Clearinghouse”) to obtain student enrollment records, (3) purchasing publicly voting records from an organization called Catalist, and (4) working with the Clearinghouse to merge and de-identify student enrollment and voting records. This process resulted in the creation of the NSLVE database.
The paper then demonstrates the ways the dataset can be merged with other data sources such as data from the U.S. Department of Education’s Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) and other institution- and state-level datasets (e.g., National Student Loan Data System, American Community Survey). Doing so allows us to understand the contribution this dataset can make toward better understanding political learning and engagement in a variety of policy and educational contexts.
Full Paper:
- Benenson and Thomas APPAM 2016.pdf (339.9KB)