Panel Paper:
Third Party Policing on Organized Crime: Evidence from the Yakuza in Japan
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
To test these ideas, we take a difference-in-differences approach by exploiting prefecture-level variations of enactment dates and the extent of competition among yakuza syndicates. We show that the YEO sharply reduce the yakuza membership and that this reduction effect is larger in prefectures with less yakuza competition. Subsequently, we find that the YEO increase total financial damage of bank transfer scams and that this effect is larger in prefectures with less yakuza competition. We lastly provide evidence that both former and current yakuza members engage in frauds, which is consistent with the idea that they struggle with their economic opportunities after the YEO and as a result commit lucrative crime. Our results survive a variety of robustness check.
This study provides novel policy implications for promotion of the public safety. The YEO contribute to a decrease in the yakuza membership, but the effect is negatively correlated to the extent of competition of yakuza syndicates. This suggests that an effective crackdown is to regulate particular syndicates intensively rather than regulate many syndicates simultaneously. In other words, as yakuza conflicts exhibit strategic complementarity, if a syndicate reduces its membership (by an intensive crackdown) then others that compete with it should reduce their memberships. Along with the benefit of the YEO, the YEO lead to an increase in profitable crime. It suggests that the promotion of the public safety demands assistance for former yakuza members' rehabilitation to the society. The rehabilitation assistance discourages former yakuza members from committing profitable crime, and moreover it encourages current members to leave yakuza syndicates. Furthermore, our results suggest that the rehabilitation assistance would be effectively implemented in prefectures with less yakuza competition.
Full Paper:
- YakuzaPaper.pdf (269.7KB)