Panel: Innovative Investigations of Health Policy and Public Preferences
(Health Policy)

Saturday, November 5, 2016: 8:30 AM-10:00 AM
Cardozo (Washington Hilton)

*Names in bold indicate Presenter

Panel Organizers:  Julia Lynch, University of Pennsylvania
Panel Chairs:  Colleen Barry, Johns Hopkins University
Discussants:  Eric Patashnik, Brown University

This panel brings together four papers addressing the sources of beliefs and attitudes about health policy problems and solutions in the United States. The papers cover diverse topics – prescription opioid abuse, minimum wage policies as a social determinant of health, nurse practitioner gatekeeping in group care models, and the ACA – and examine the beliefs of both mass publics and policy-makers. They are united in their investigations of the underlying, often unconscious, motivations for policy choices that affect population health in the United States, with three papers using innovative survey-experimental methods and the fourth examining the content of local television, an under-examined but dominant source of information for Americans. The authors and presenters include leading analysts of opinions about population health policy as well as younger scholars, hailing from public health, public policy, social work, and political science. Haselswerdt and Rigby examine how state-level health policy advocates’ support for minimum wage increases are affected by policy frames focused on Health in All Policy ideas versus more traditional economic arguments. Kennedy-Hendricks et al. explore the sources of social stigma directed toward prescription opioid abusers, and show that members of the public who hold stigmatizing beliefs are more supportive of punitive policies and less supportive of public health-oriented policies. Lynch et al. examine how political partisanship and ideology are related to the degree of support for limits on insurance coverage of direct access to MDs in group care settings where nurse practitioners are gatekeepers. And Gollust et al. investigate local television news media coverage of the ACA during the first open enrollment period, finding a stronger focus on political controversies about the law than on reporting factual information about enrollment or the effects of the law.

Health in All Politics? Evidence from a Survey Experiment of Policy Elites
Jake Haselswerdt, University of Missouri and Elizabeth Rigby, George Washington University



How Is Social Stigma Toward Individuals with Prescription Opioid Use Disorder Associated with Public Support for Punitive and Public Health-Oriented Policies?
Alene Kennedy-Hendricks1, Colleen Barry1, Sarah Gollust2, Margaret Ensminger1, Margaret Chisolm1 and Emma E. McGinty1, (1)Johns Hopkins University, (2)University of Minnesota



Public Support for Team-Based Care Models: Results from a Survey of Attitudes Toward Gated Access to MD-Level Providers
Julia Lynch1, Rachel Hadler2, Julia Berenson3 and Lee Fleisher1, (1)University of Pennsylvania, (2)University of Pittsburgh, (3)Columbia University



Local News Media Coverage of the Affordable Care Act, 2013-2014
Sarah Gollust1, Laura Baum2, Colleen Barry3, Jeff Niederdeppe4 and Erika Franklin Fowler2, (1)University of Minnesota, (2)Wesleyan University, (3)Johns Hopkins University, (4)Cornell University




See more of: Health Policy
See more of: Panel