Panel Paper:
Mandatory Minimum Sentences: The Impact on Crack and Powder Cocaine Use
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
Methods: Data come from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). The 1985 & 1990 waves (N=6,518) were used to examine the impact of the ADAA; the 2009 & 2011 waves were used to examine the impact of the FSA (N=43,961). Weighted multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the proportional change in past-year use of crack cocaine and powder cocaine before and after implementation of each law. Change is drug use rates were also compared against a negative control of prescription drugs, which were not included in either the ADAA or FSA. Z-tests were used to test for equality of coefficients across the estimates.
Results: While crack cocaine use did not decline after the ADAA (odds ratio (OR): 0.72, p=0.09), both powder cocaine and prescription drug abuse decreased (respectively OR: 0.64, p<0.01; 0.59, p<0.01). However, comparatively, the change in use rates did not differ by type of cocaine (Z-score: 0.51, p=0.70) or when compared against prescription drugs (crack v. prescription Z-score: -0.80, p=0.21; powder cocaine v prescriptions Z-score: -0.41, p=0.34). Use of all three drugs decreased after the FSA (Crack OR: 0.55, p<0.01; powder cocaine OR: 0.81, p<0.01; prescription drugs OR: 0.83, p<0.01), with crack cocaine decreasing more than prescription drug use (Z-score: 2.13, p=0.03). The difference between the decline in crack and powder cocaine after the FSA was not appreciable (Z-score: 1.89, p=0.06).
Conclusion: Despite differential penalties for crack and powder cocaine use under the ADAA, there was no differential impact on use by type of cocaine or in comparison to a negative control. Similarly, the reduction in penalties under the FSA did not differentially impact use: both forms of cocaine decreased over this period, as did use of drugs not included in the law. Therefore, it cannot be concluded that reduction in use was a direct result of these mandatory minimum policies. Policy makers aiming to discourage drug use behaviors should consider policies other than mandatory minimums to most effectively impact behaviors.