DC Accepted Papers Paper:
Democratic Meritocracy: Respecting the Importance of Merit without Neglecting the Power of Democracy
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
The implicit argument wrong assumes that large democracies like the United States lacks a system of meritocracy to complement or supplant representative democracy. That is wrong: The United States maintains a far larger and more influential meritocracy at the multiple levels of the Federal government than often credited. The role of the civil, foreign, and uniformed service meritocracies design and execute major policy decisions in the United States while still respecting democracy and the will of the people, or at least their elected representatives. The whole of the American government workforce must be explorer to more accurately articulate these comparisons, not just the few politically appointed emissaries of a particular administration.
There are a variety of meritocratic processes already existing in the United States that are more apt examples of his argument of the need for people with merit in government– and perhaps some of these American meritocratic norms and examination system can be used by China to reduce both the perceived and real corruption of its un-elected, meritocratic system of government.