DC Accepted Papers Paper:
Physician Payments & Routine Preventive Care in HIV Management: Racial Differences in the US South
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
Methods: We integrated person-level demographic information and administrative claims for health services (Medicaid Analytic eXtract, 2008-2012), state Medicaid-to-Medicare physician fee ratios (Urban Institute, 2008, 2012), and county and state characteristics for 15 US Southern states plus District of Columbia. The fee ratio reflects Medicaid physician payments relative to Medicare rates, which aim to reflect costs of care and typically exceed Medicaid payment rates. Outcomes included six clinically important, annually recommended RPC screenings for HIV management: lipid panel, glucose, sexually transmitted infections (syphilis, chlamydia, gonorrhea), and cervical cancer, defined as ≥1 claim for a given RPC screen per calendar year. We assessed the association between state-level physician payments and RPC screening using multivariable race-stratified logistic regression.
Findings: The sample included 54,893 Medicaid enrollees living with HIV, aged 19-64 years, non-dual eligible for Medicare and without any private insurance, and continuously enrolled in Medicaid ≥1 calendar year. The percentage of enrollees receiving RPC screening ranged from 20.5% to 63.5% for glucose and cervical cancer, respectively. Non-Hispanic Blacks were significantly more likely to be screened for four of the six outcomes compared to non-Hispanic Whites. A ten-percentage point increase in the fee ratio was significantly associated with a 6% (aOR 1.06, 95% CI [1.03–1.09]; chlamydia) to 30% (1.30, [1.27–1.34]; syphilis) increase in the odds of RPC screening (Table). The association of the fee ratio with RPC screening was positive and significant in five out of six outcomes among non-Hispanic Blacks, but only for syphilis among non-Hispanic Whites.
Conclusion: Higher physician payments are associated with increased RPC screening, primarily among non-Hispanic Blacks. Increasing state-level physician payments may improve RPC for HIV management. A nuanced understanding of factors that further explain differences in this relationship is needed.
Routine preventive care screening |
Overall sample (N=54,893; PY=177,130) |
Non-Hispanic Blacks (N=29,607; PY=95,078) |
Non-Hispanic Whites (N=7,957; PY=24,956) |
||||
Percent-screened |
aOR (95% CI) |
Percent-screened |
aOR (95% CI) |
Percent-screened |
aOR (95% CI) |
||
Lipid panel |
43.6 |
1.12*** (1.09–1.15) |
46.2 |
1.14*** (1.11–1.17) |
53.4 |
1.01 (0.88–1.15) |
|
Blood glucose |
20.5 |
1.08*** (1.04–1.12) |
23.3 |
1.07*** (1.03–1.11) |
21.3 |
0.89 (0.76–1.07) |
|
Sexually transmitted infections |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syphilis |
38.6 |
1.30*** (1.27–1.34) |
42.5 |
1.30*** (1.27–1.34) |
42.5 |
1.22*** (1.07–1.39) |
|
Chlamydia |
23.4 |
1.06*** (1.03–1.09) |
26.5 |
1.07*** (1.04–1.10) |
21.1 |
0.98 (0.85–1.14) |
|
Gonorrhea |
28.6 |
1.11*** (1.08–1.16) |
31.2 |
1.12*** (1.09–1.16) |
29.6 |
1.13 (0.98–1.29) |
|
Cervical cancer† |
63.5 |
1.04 (0.83–1.31) |
71.8 |
0.99 (0.77–1.29) |
68.2 |
2.96 (0.91–9.61) |
Abbreviations: N=Number of patients; PY=Number of enrollee person-years; CI=Confidence interval; aOR=Adjusted odds ratio
* p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001
†Restricted to female enrollees without an abnormal Pap test or cervical-cancer diagnosis.