Panel Paper:
Motivations for and Use of Contract Labor Among Nonprofit Arts Organizations
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
The use of contract labor by organizations in both the private and public sector has been growing. While there is no good source on ‘contingent employment’ – a term used to describe “people who do not expect their jobs to last or who reported their jobs are temporary” (U.S. Department of Labor, 2018) – we can use proxy data to understand general trends. For example, U.S. Census Bureau data on nonemployer firms, which are firms that earn at least $1000 per year in gross revenues but employ no workers, suggest that the gig-economy is “significant and growing fast” (Hathaway & Muro, 2016). Soon, the U.S. Census Bureau will release its second data collection effort on contingent employment, which will identify workers in the nonprofit sector (the first was conducted in 2005).
In this paper, we use data on nonprofit arts organizations, which detail level of 1099 (i.e., independent contractor) expenses for approximately 4000 nonprofit arts organizations in California, Maryland, and Pennsylvania between 2011 and 2016. The data are collected by DataArts, an initiative which collects financial, programmatic, and operational information on arts nonprofits. In addition to illustrating trends in contract labor among nonprofit arts organizations, the paper analyzes substitution between wages and contract labor among nonprofit arts organizations in these states.
This study is the first in the nonprofit studies field to quantify contract labor spending at nonprofit firms among a large set of organizations. Furthermore, it is the first study that begins to hypothesize the motivations of what is often called entrepreneurship among nonprofit organizations, but might instead be measures taken by organizations to reduce costs or improve organizational efficiency. The latter has serious implications for the quality of jobs in the nonprofit sector.