Panel Paper:
Does Effectiveness Matter for Teacher Mobility and Attrition Under at-Will Employment Agreements?
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
Although many states have introduced evaluation systems, eliminated traditional job protections, and experimented with compensation strategies, there has been little research that has provided a comprehensive understanding of how these policy changes affect teacher mobility and attrition. Particularly with respect to teacher effectiveness. This study seeks to fill this gap by studying labor market outcomes of teachers based on effectiveness in New Orleans. Specifically, we examine the extent to which less effective teachers exit the profession, the effectiveness of incoming teachers replacing them, and finally, the mobility patterns of highly effective teachers.
New Orleans provides a unique policy environment to study these questions as the city’s public education system is comprised entirely of charter schools where charter management organizations (CMOs) have complete autonomy over decisions regarding retention and compensation of their teachers. New Orleans also has a very strong accountability system that closes schools based on poor performance, thus providing school leaders additional incentives to focus on the effectiveness of their teachers.
Preliminary results suggest that the attrition rates of less effective teachers in New Orleans are higher than comparison districts that have more traditional job protections and compensation systems. However, the attrition rates of highly effective teachers are also higher in New Orleans than comparison districts. Highly effective teachers are also more mobile. Finally, the average effectiveness of incoming teachers is not statistically different than the average effectiveness of exiting teachers.