Panel Paper:
Immigration Policy Flux: Changing Enforcement Strategies and Their Impacts on Public Sector Bureaucratic Perceptions and Perspectives
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
Policy feedback speaks to the notion that policies can transform political landscapes in ways that affect future policy designs. While much of this literature examines feedback effects on target groups themselves to better understand how previous policies shape future policy designs, it could also be that previous policies influence future policy designs indirectly through its effects on public sector bureaucrats responsible for executing said polices. As stated by Soss and Moynihan (2014), “Policies are political forces in their own right that can alter key components of administration” such as their social constructions, motivations, and cultures, that in turn could affect the degree to which policies are publicly supported and executed according to principals’ wishes. Given the influence bureaucrats exert on the policy process, it is therefore somewhat surprising when these prominent scholars say public administration has largely been neglected in the literature examining policy feedback effects.
We examine the effects of changing immigration enforcement priorities described above using data from the FEVS for years 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010, and 2015-2017. To identify arguably causal effects, we use a difference-in-difference approach where the treatment group is DHS bureaucrats and the control group is bureaucrats in federal agencies with missions unrelated to immigration and national security. We believe findings from this examination will have implications for DHS officials, policymakers, and feedback scholars considering the substantial public resistance to recent immigration reforms.