Poster Paper:
Where Does the “Utilization Gap” Come from? Rethinking Open APIs in E-Government
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
Since 2013, the Korean government has released data that has been compiled over the years, along with an initiative called Government 3.0, which unlocks data in the key public interest sectors. Having released more than 20,000 data sets for 698 agencies, Korea is ranked first among the OECD member countries, with regard to data openness. However, to date, the focus has been on data volume in the public sector, rather than on the quality of the open API documentation, which is the key to utilizing open APIs. In addition, there are large discrepancies across open APIs provided by each department of government. In light of the utilization gap among them, it is critical to know how the various factors affect the utilization gap. In this paper, information regarding portal traffic statistics will be collected by web crawling from the national open data portal and analyzed to determine (1) whether there are discrepancies between the data volume and utilization, indicated by two factors: the number of open APIs downloaded and the API key to track API requests, (2) which factors cause the discrepancies, and (3) whether different factors explain the different types of discrepancies in the department of government and the characteristics of the data.
Together, the findings from the utilization gap of open APIs provide valuable insight into how we can leverage innovative technologies. With more data being institutionalized and utilized in line with potentially unlimited possibilities, there are more opportunities for the public sector to convert data into ideas and ideas into impact. Users interested in utilizing open APIs to analyze the current state and participating in decision-making based on ample data often face difficulties in using it. This study focuses on effective data management for optimal utilization, considering accessibility and standardization in the public sector while determining the factors causing the utilization gap.