Panel Paper:
Technology, Information, and School Choice: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
This paper presents the results from a second year of the school-level RCT, which expanded the number of schools served to over 450 and the types of interventions offered to include a variety of technological innovations. School personnel received the intervention tools to distribute, along with supportive materials (lesson plans, video guides, and support from the study office), simulating the most likely mode of dissemination if a school district were to adopt such tools. Schools were randomly assigned to one of three informational interventions or a control group. The three interventions were:
1) Curated List of High Schools: this group received a middle school-specific concise listing of 26 geographically proximate high schools with graduation rates above 70%, along with travel time information, the graduation rate, and information about how to apply. In cross-randomization within this group, students received either a digital or paper version of the tool. A further cross-randomization made slight variations to the high school list. A third of high school lists included a caution about two nearby high schools that had low graduation rates and a third of the lists included a caution about two nearby high schools that had low admissions rates.
2) Personalized Information about High Schools from a School Choice “App”: this group received a guided introduction to an interactive smartphone/web-based tool designed to help students translate their preferences into a list of school recommendations. The app serves as a “virtual guidance counselor,” prompting students to identify their current middle school and their preferences for commute time, academic interests, and extra-curricular interests. It then generates a list of schools, along with performance data, that students can save, share, and explore further.
3) General Information about High Schools from a Searchable Directory: This group received a guided introduction to the NYCDOE SchoolFinder, a search engine for finding high schools launched in the 2016-17 high school admissions cycle. Since all students had access to this tool (including in the control group), this group allows us to test the effect of the supportive materials that were offered as part of the intervention.
Results will be available for presentation at the APPAM conference.