Panel:
Towards a Better Understanding of Retention and Support of the STEM Pipeline and Workforce
(Innovations in Science and Technology)
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
What particularly distinguishes this session is that all four papers are making use of new and/or under-utilized data. In looking at peer effects, one study analyzes a dataset from a large, public minority-serving undergraduate institution, while another uses graduate transcript data from all public universities in Ohio. These studies focus on women and minorities. The third paper exploits data on a specific NIH fellowship award to investigate how award selection (whether by the program director or peer review) affects career outcomes, while the fourth paper uses underutilized restricted SESTAT data to investigate the retention of women in the biomedical research workforce.
The purpose of this session is to bring together researchers and nonacademics so that we can help advance policy to support and improve the STEM pipeline, retain talent in the STEM workforce, and enhance the quality of scientific research.