Panel Paper:
Paternity Leave and Father’s Parenting: Differences Between Resident and Non-Resident Fathers
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
To address these gaps in the literature we examine the following questions: 1) What do patterns of father’s leave taking look like (any leave, paid leave, weeks of leave, reasons for not taking leave) and whether they vary by coresidence and marital status? 2) What are the predictors of leave and do they vary by coresidence and marital status? And 3) is paternal leave associated with fathering (engagement, harsh parenting, coparenting) and does this vary by coresidence and marital status? We use data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study (N~2650), a longitudinal birth cohort of children born between 1998 and 2000 and their parents. Fathers were interviewed at the birth of the child and again when children were ages 1, 3 and 5. The study included an oversample of non-marital births, making it ideal for examining non-resident fathers. Consistent with prior research, preliminary analyses find that fathers who took leave had higher parenting engagement at ages 1, 3, and 5 than fathers who did not take leave. Unlike earlier research, we find that this association is only significant for non-resident fathers. We find similar patterns when we examine weeks of leave, and when we examine economically disadvantaged fathers (less than high school degree). We find no evidence that the association is stronger for paid leave.
Policy makers have struggled to develop policies to encourage non-resident father involvement in parenting. Prior research has demonstrated that non-resident fathers’ parenting decreases dramatically after parents’ romantic relationships end (Edin, Tach, & Mincy, 2010). However, results from our work indicate that paternity leave may be an important policy lever for increasing parenting involvement among vulnerable non-resident fathers.