Panel Paper:
Welfare Rules, Incentive Effects, and Family Structure
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
In this study, we emphasize that the eligibility and benefit rules of AFDC and TANF are based more on the biological relationship between the children and any male in the household than on marriage or cohabitation per se. For our analysis, we use data from the Survey of Income Program Participation (SIPP) for the years 1996 (the interview took place just before implementation of the law), 2001, 2004, and 2008. This time frame allows us to look for effects over a longer period than most past studies cited above. The SIPP is a particularly good data source for this analysis because it contains a household relationship matrix identifying the biological relationships between the children and all of the adults in the household. Taking advantage of this detailed family information, we examine the effect of the 1990s welfare reforms on family structure outcomes that accurately match the rules of the welfare programs. Using data from a year prior to the reform and from several years after it, we find that pre-TANF waiver policies had modest effects in increasing rates of single motherhood and decreasing rates of marriage to men who were biological fathers of the children. These effects were magnified in states which enacted particularly harsh work-related policies after 1996. Our results demonstrate the importance of distinguishing family structure by biological status for understanding the effects of welfare reforms.
Full Paper: