Panel Paper:
How Did the Affordable Care Act’s Marketplace Coverage Affect Household Consumption: Evidence from the Consumer Expenditure Survey
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
We use the 2011–2015 Consumer Expenditure Survey, a nationally representative, household-level panel survey, to provide descriptive evidence on how the availability of marketplace coverage has affected coverage household premium spending, out-of-pocket medical expenditures, and non-medical consumption. We also use several recently proposed identification strategies –simulated tax credit eligibility and differences in state-level marketplace enrollment caused by website implementation delays – to provide estimates of marketplace coverage on coverage, out-of-pocket medical expenditures and non-medical consumption. In preliminary results we find that the expected size of marketplace tax subsidies is positively correlated with having non-group coverage, but is not related to changes in the having any private coverage, non-group or employer-sponsored. We also find that the expected size of the subsidy is negatively correlated with premium payments and out-of-pocket spending on prescription drugs. We also find that state-level enrollment is positively correlated with increased non-group coverage.
In addition to providing descriptive and causal evidence on the impact of new subsidized marketplace coverage under the ACA, we will also simulate the impact of alternative age-based health insurance tax subsidies under the American Health Care Act on household out-of-pocket health expenditures and other consumption. The results of this study will provide new evidence on the impact of health insurance marketplaces on economic wellbeing of low and middle-income families, and also help to quantify the impact of newly proposed options for health reform.