Poster Paper: Are Women Held to Higher Standards in the NIH Peer Review Process ?

Thursday, November 8, 2018
Exhibit Hall C - Exhibit Level (Marriott Wardman Park)

*Names in bold indicate Presenter

Silda Nikaj, Rachael Walsh and Paul Jordan, National Institutes of Health


We test whether there are gender differences in the outcomes of NIH peer review for independent investigator grants. We survey all funded NIH grants and map up the process to award by gender. Using similar readability scoring as Hengel (2017), we examine potential gender differences in funding and resubmission. We model how many additional grants and funding women researchers could have received in the absence of observed differences and evaluate the long-term effects on a researcher’s career measured by subsequent grant funding, publications, and tenure.