Panel Paper:
Evaluating the Link between Abawd Work Requirements and Household Food Insecurity Status
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
Because of the systematically high unemployment rates that followed the Great Recession, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) offered all states the ability to suspend ABAWD work requirements without having to seek federal approval as of April 1, 2009. Most states followed suit for several years. Some states have since begun to reinstate work requirements in some or all counties, at a staggered pace. The combination of ARRA’s blanket action to suspend work requirements, the varied timing of work requirement reinstatement within and across states, and lingering waivers in other states to date provide the opportunity to study the consequences of imposing work requirements upon ABAWDs. Previous research has yielded mixed results when examining the effects of ABAWD work requirements on SNAP participation and employment-related outcomes (Cuffey, Mykerezi, and Beatty, 2015; Wilde, Cook, Gundersen, Nord, and Tiehen (2000); Ziliak, Gundersen, and Figlio, 2003).
Through their influence on SNAP participation, work requirements may also be consequential for SNAP recipients’ household food insecurity status. Using a difference-in-difference strategy to analyze Current Population Survey data and county-level ABAWD policy data, this study will evaluate the effect of work requirements on the presence and depth of household food insecurity of ABAWD households.