Panel Paper:
Is There a Double Standard? Assessing How Public Manager Race Shapes Effects Citizens’ Responses to Performance Information Disclosure
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
The objective of this study is to help shed light on this important issue. Our assessment is guided by two research questions:
- Do white citizens hold public organizations led by black public managers to a different performance standard than those led by white public managers?
- Will greater exposure to performance information help mitigate this bias, if present?
To explore these questions we designed two 2 by 2 survey experiments where we vary the race of the public manager (white versus black) and the level of performance information exposure (high versus low). The first survey experiment is carried out in a context of negative performance information (n = 800) and the second in a context of positive performance information (n = 800). In the negative performance information study, we found increased exposure to negative performance information resulted in more negative performance evaluations of public organizations led by black public managers (relative to white public managers) and strengthened preferences to punish black public managers (relative to white public managers). Conversely, in the positive performance information study, we found no evidence of racial bias in participant responses to performance information. Overall, this study offers insight into how innate discrimination on the part of citizens helps shape the representativeness of public organizations. Given the positive performance outputs associated with more diverse, representative public organizations, this offers a new perspective on factors that inhibit attempts to foster greater diversity in public organizations.