Panel Paper:
Effects of Infertility Insurance Mandates on Maternal Mortality
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
Extensive work using difference-in-differences approaches has found the infertility insurance mandates were associated with increases in the use of infertility treatment and increases in births and multiple births. Less work has explored how these mandates affected maternal outcomes. This paper considers how mandated insurance coverage of infertility treatment affected maternal mortality. The mandates could have affected maternal mortality in several ways. To the extent that the mandates increase the number of women giving birth, they will increase the number of women dying as a result of pregnancy- and birth-related causes. From this channel, the effect on the overall maternal mortality rate will be determined by whether these pregnancies are more or less at risk of leading to maternal mortality than the average birth. The mandates may also have an effect through changing the choice of procedures of differing risk.
To consider effects of the mandates on maternal mortality, analyses apply difference-in-differences methods using 1981-1998 Vital Statistics data on births and maternal mortality for women ages 35-49. The paper exploits variation by state and over time in mandated health insurance coverage of infertility treatment to examine the effect of the mandates on maternal mortality. To this end, I examine the effect of the mandates on the birth rate (births per population), the death rate (deaths per population), and the maternal mortality rate (deaths per births). I examine these outcomes separately by race. I further examine the maternal mortality rate by detailed cause of death and consider heterogeneity in state mandates.
Preliminary results show the mandates associated with an increase in the birth rate for White women ages 35-49. Results do not show a proportional increase in the death rate; as a result, results show a decrease in the maternal mortality rate associated with the mandates. These results can be valuable in considering the effects of health insurance coverage of infertility treatment and inform decision-making at the federal, state, and employer levels.
Full Paper: