Panel Paper:
Implications of Precarious Work Schedules for the Expansion of Work Requirements in Safety Net Programs
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
This study draws on data from the December 2018 Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey—a nationally representative, internet-based survey of approximately 7,500 US nonelderly adults—to examine the prevalence of precarious work schedules among workers whose families participate in safety net programs. We find that, among nondisabled adults whose families participated in SNAP, TANF, rental assistance programs, or Medicaid or other public health insurance coverage in the past year, nearly 60 percent were working at the time of the survey, including nearly half who worked for an employer at their main job. Workers participating in safety net programs were more likely than nonparticipants to report working a rotating, split, or irregular work shift schedule (19.9 percent versus 14.4 percent) and less likely to work a regular daytime shift (58.3 percent versus 74.5 percent). They were also more likely to experience large fluctuations in weekly hours worked in the past month. Nearly 2 in 5 workers participating in safety net programs have no more than a week’s notice of their work schedule compared to about 1 in 5 nonparticipant workers, and safety net participants are more likely than nonparticipants to report limited control over when their workday begins and ends.
These findings suggest that current work requirement policies will increase the risk that families with working adults will lose access to public benefits if the policies are not designed to reflect the reality of instability in program participants’ work schedules.
Full Paper: