Panel Paper:
Mothers’ Interest in an Intervention to Improve Coparenting Relationships with Low-Income Nonresidential Fathers
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
Mothers were recruited in one of three ways at 9 responsible fatherhood programs: (1) the father was recruited through advertisements at the agency sites or information sessions conducted at other community-based parenting programs, (2) the mother was recruited through advertisements in local and online mothering groups, or (3) the mother reached out to the coordinator after hearing of the class from a previous participant. The fathers of the participating mother’s child completed a pre-test, post-test, and follow-up survey prior to, directly after, and 3 months after the mother completed the Understanding Dad™ class. All measures of predictors were obtained from fathers’ pretest surveys.
For mothers who were recruited by way of fathers providing the project coordinator with her contact information (N = 218), an average of 6 contact attempts were made to each mother, with a maximum of 20 attempts per mother. Contact attempts included phone calls and text messages and were made by the site project coordinator until (a) the coordinator could not get in contact with the mother after 20 attempts, (b) the mother expressed disinterest in the study as a whole, (c) the mother expressed that she would like to do the surveys but could not participate in the class, or (d) the mother expressed interest in the class.
Results of logistic regression analyses revealed that mothers’ interest in the program was significantly and positively related to fathers reporting more positive relationships with the mother, fathers having fewer legal challenges, fathers’ past coresidence with the mother, and fathers having children with multiple mothers. We also found an inverted “U-shaped” relationship between father reports of coparentng alliance and mothers’ interest. That is, mothers were more interested in the program when fathers reported moderate levels of alliance. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.