Panel Paper:
Research Partnerships with CTE Intermediaries: Laying the Groundwork for Program Improvement and Evaluation
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
In these partnerships with CTE intermediaries, particularly those still early in their development, we have found that they are typically fully extended when they're trying to manage relationships between and link the work of high schools, colleges, and employers. This means that also learning systematically about the ongoing implementation of their programs in ways that they can funnel back into improvements of their program models can stretch them beyond capacity. These intermediaries often lack the data infrastructure needed to collect, store, and analyze information for the combined purpose of research and development. Thus, their research and development efforts are more likely to proceed in a piecemeal, disconnected way. For example, an organization might employ a management information system (MIS) to track some aspects of program implementation, such as participants’ engagement in internships or apprenticeships, but when the program team desires to analyze outcomes or use data to better target services or supports to specific individuals, they are often unprepared to integrate data from other systems and sometimes need to create an entirely new data system.
In recognition of these challenges, we have found that a research partner can be valuable in taking on investigations of program implementation as well as helping to sort through potential data sources and measures to support an intermediary's organization of information. The research partnership often starts with the creation of a logic model that clarifies links between measurable program components and desired outcomes for participants. This logic model provides the foundation for the development of a performance measurement framework. MDRC works with these CTE programs along the continuum of program improvement and evaluation to continue to build more rigorous evidence while strengthening program operations. In the early stages, our research has included implementation and descriptive outcomes while at the same time working alongside programs to help them think about what services they provide above and beyond what is available to its target population. This lays the groundwork work to eventually have their impact assessed as rigorously as is feasible, if and when that is appropriate, while building capacity for them to own much of this work increasingly over time.