Panel Paper:
Do Public Organizations Have Reputations for Diversity? The Study of Women and Minorities’ Decision to Work in Public Organizations
*Names in bold indicate Presenter
This study focuses on organizational reputation to explain why people are attracted to jobs in the public sector, particularly redistributive agencies. We define organizational reputation for diversity as peoples’ beliefs of organizations that they treat and protect under-privileged groups equally; the beliefs are constructed based on organizations’ mission, history, and obligation (Carpenter, 2010; Roberson and Park 2007; Riccucci 2009). According to Signaling theory, organizational reputation is important information that influences people deciding jobs who experience constraints accessing the full and accurate information about organizations’ tasks, benefits, and culture (Spence 1974). By understanding how an organizational reputation for diversity is associated with women and minorities’ job decisions, we can have an empirical hint of why the public sector and redistributive agencies have signals of the workforce diversity and attract a particular pool of applicants.
The primary goals of this study are to explore whether the organizational reputation of diversity can provide relevant answers to the question of why people, particularly women race minorities decide to work in the public sector or redistributive agencies. To address the research issues above, we used survey data of 700 public managers in the US. With the data, we also were able to select females and racial minorities as sub-samples for the empirical analysis to identify whether these less privileged groups process considerations differently in selecting their jobs than do their white male counterparts. The results support that the public sector, especially redistributive agencies, attract people who concern more of organizations’ reputations for workforce diversity. The findings shed lights on the importance of an organizational reputation in people’s job decisions.